រ៉េត ស៊ូហ្សាណា បង្ហើរបទចម្រៀង ជាភាសាខ្មែរ ពិតជាពីរោះមិនចាញ់បទបរទេសret zuzana

manage laws that identify with the direction or concealment of what is viewed as disgusting material. In the United States, this for the most part spins around explicit entertainment and issues of the right to speak freely. Since oversight laws established to battle profanity limit opportunity of expression, making a legitimate meaning of foulness is an exceptionally troublesome suggestion. The deal and conveyance of "vulgar" materials has been disallowed in most American states for quite a long time, However, a large portion of the enactment identifying with profanity has not obviously characterized what it is, abandoning it to courts to figure out if something is disgusting or not. While the Supreme Court has decided that vulgarity is not secured by the First Amendment, it, as well, has abandoned it to trial courts to figure out what revolting materials are. Essentially, a matter is just foul on the off chance that it would be considered so by the neighborhood group benchmarks. This standard for all intents and purposes guarantees that the meaning of what is indecent will fluctuate broadly starting with one area then onto the next. For more data on vulgarity law, please survey the materials underneath. Furthermore, you might have the capacity to discover a lawyer with experience managing vulgarity in your purview on the Law Firms page of our site.